Goal Setting Experiment Update: Total Failure

The failure's so colossal, I don't even have an accurate calendar shot...  Sorry!

The failure’s so colossal, I don’t even have an accurate calendar shot… Sorry!

Yes, I failed. And badly.  In all ways.  I couldn’t even track things properly for a calendar shot.  My resolve to use the “Don’t Break the Chain” method, the least onerous version of goal-tracking that exists, failed at the same time my resolution to journal did.  I didn’t even have the will to go back and track my “secret” goal after February 4th, the day I last journaled.

State your goal publicly– the journaling failure.

On February 5th, I just didn’t have the will to force myself to write more free-form introspective tripe pulled from my Prompt Box.  On February 6th, I just completely forgot, and the 7th, even though I made a mental note to resume my journaling practice, I never got around to it.  By the 8th, I’d just completely given up and had no desire to resume the next week.  I’d like to use my two-week long bout with the flu as an excuse for not resuming on February 11th, but really, I just didn’t want to.

I found myself avoiding blogging completely the week of the 18th because I didn’t want to admit my failure.  So, not only did I fail, but I procrastinated on admitting said failure.  Kind of pathetic if you think about it.

Secret goal failure — not really a failure.  More a postponement.

I actually was successful at my more secret goal.  I kept up the practice until Saturday, February 9, even if I didn’t “track” it.  I exercised four times that week, and only when Saturday’s extremely strenuous workout made me succumb to the flu with only three hours’ advance warning did I temporarily give up.  Still, the buildup and the prior workouts left me addicted to exercise, and I ended up suffering major withdrawal pangs when I could finally get out of bed on February 14th.  I’m doing a modified “schedule” this week: yoga twice and the boxing-ish bootcamp workout this Saturday.

Conclusions?  Not what you’d think.

  • Goal-tracking sucks.  I’ve never been good at keeping any kind of routine tracking going for a long period.  Never.  So, I’m not surprised I couldn’t keep up with even the simplest method.  I liked my first week of Xs, but they didn’t exactly motivate me.  I didn’t care about not having a second.  I usually keep track of progress mentally, so that’s not a particularly surprising conclusion for yours truly.  Adding another habit, the tracking habit, to the additional two I was trying to establish was stupid, honestly.
  • Journaling isn’t something that’s actually important to me.  In fact, it seems actively toxic.  Some people find journaling therapeutic.  Some people find that writing things down helps them get their problems out of their heads.  I’ve always used writing things down as a method for remembering dates, facts and events, not as a way to clear mental clutter.  I naturally ruminate over everything.  Writing down my ruminations just added more introspective claptrap to my already self-paralyzing analytical process.  What actually made me stop journaling was the topic on February 4th: “What 5 things do you want to do before it’s too late?”  I already spend too much time thinking my impending death and running out of time, but this had me actively contemplating how I’d die.  Not exactly fun stuff.
  • I’m trying to create a new habit in addition to my “artificial” experimental habit that’s actually important to my well-being. I’ve already written about my early forays into the realm of cooking; I’m trying to gain more control of my horrible diet.  That’s far more important to both my short-term and long-term health than is writing in a journal.  So, maybe I’m suffering from habit-forming overload, which is apparently a real concern.
  • Is setting a specific goal really something that should be done in the first place?  This is something I’ve really been wondering about.   Every last bit of motivational writing you come across talks about the values of setting specific time-based goals, and making sure they’re realistic (SMART goals, anyone?).  I’ve never had a lot of luck with that approach.  Somehow, no matter how specific and how “realistic” I think I’m being when I set a goal, I’m always way off, and I end up being discouraged for not perfectly achieving what I set out to do.  I find I’m better off aiming for a loose future objective, and making subtle course-correcting tweaks as I go along.

Cognitive reframing?

My “secret” goal of exercising an hour (at least) four times a week is one that I’ve actually had to step away from as a “goal.”  My best success in the past has come in finding disciplines I enjoy, and looking at exercise as another way of playing.  At this point, my theoretical exercise schedule (and, oh how I hate that word!), is pretty rigid with four separate exercise classes, something that could drive me to insanity if I think about it that way.

I’ve already mentioned that I loathe too much structure and too much “tracking,” I think, and if I haven’t specifically, there it is.  Structure to me is death.  It’s routine.  It’s confining and painful and the very antithesis of enjoyable.  Tracking after the fact is more routine and structure added to my life.  Four separately scheduled events, then, adds that much more “routine.”  It helps that I enjoy said events, but if I think about them too much in scheduling terms, I find I don’t enjoy them as much, even if I objectively do.

The brain’s a funny organ, isn’t it?  You can trick it and manipulate it into doing anything if you really try.  That’s what I’ve been doing on the exercise front so that I keep enjoying myself.  Instead of “going to classes” that happen at “specific times,” I tell myself, It’s time to go play!  Suddenly the dull routine of changing clothes and driving through sometimes awful traffic to arrive at said classes doesn’t seem quite so onerous.  I put on my play-clothes and I sit myself in my play-car, and I sing along with old 80’s songs as I’m stuck at long traffic lights because it’s fun-time.  And then I’m sweating because I’m playing, not because I’m engaging in strenuous physical activity.

Future plans…

Maybe I’ll try the experiment again someday when a sickness won’t derail it.  I really would like some real answers to come from it, and I’m curious to see if I’ll ever be able to make concrete goal-setting work for me in any fashion.

Shallot is another word for “Waaah!” – A Space Cadet Confronts the Mysteries of Cooking

Was ist das?

Was ist das?

Why cook?

That’s the real question, isn’t it?  Why?  I’ve asked myself that one time and time again.  Unfortunately, the answer has usually been, “Don’t wanna.”  I mean, there are legions upon legions of locations that will do all the hard work for you.  You know, all the chopping, all the washing, all the measuring, all the actual stirring and sautéing and baking and grilling.  And all of them can do a better job than I can.  McDonald’s does a better job.

Except that I’m not a young string bean anymore.  I can’t eat the kind of sludge I ate at twenty and not expect to show extremely adverse results.  Then there’s the marriage thing, and the inevitable discussions and debates and utter lack of decision-making that someone else equally wishy-washy brings into the whole food-obtaining process.  In short, eating after you’ve paired up is a lot more complicated than when you’re single and eating a bowl of cereal for a late-night dinner-snack-whatever-meal-thingie.

So, yeah, after nine years of marriage, the time has finally come to actually try to wrestle a little sanity back into eating and food procurement.  My innards, honestly, can’t take much more.

Problems, oh the pain of problems!

  • I hate eating the same thing over and over.  Recipes are huge and cumbersome affairs that result in the hell of leftovers.
  • Finding a decent recipe is nigh unto impossible.  Cooking and chopping and mixing and stirring for three hours just to end up with tasteless slop is unbearable agony.
  • Husband can only cook three things: chili (terrible), spaghetti (boring!), and Kraft Mac N Cheez.  He doesn’t mind eating the three things forever for the rest of his existence.  Note inherent conflict with my problem #1.
  • I utterly suck at cooking.  I utterly suck at shopping.  I hate doing the same thing every day over and over.
  • I manage to injure myself doing the easiest and stupidest of things.
  • Making shopping lists and actually getting the right items at the store is surprisingly challenging for a space cadet like me.
  • I hate cleaning up and doing dishes.

I can just hear the voices tut-tutting me for being so petty and useless.  You’re right.  I am.  The most simple and routine of activities for most humans, the most trivial of things that many take up as an actual hobby has proved near impossible to me for most of my childhood and adult existence.

Research, the root of all solutions!

So, I started digging.  My husband had seen several threads on Reddit about low-cost, low-prep and simple cooking.  I started reading and digging and all of a sudden the detail centers of my brain overloaded.  My eyes bled as I read yet another recipe and tried to envision the interplay of yet another ten ingredients.  Really, I can do a pretty good job of predicting taste from a list of ingredients, but I can only do it for a few minutes before my brain goes into shutdown mode.

Still, after three or four nights of brain overload, I came to a few realizations:

  • I can put up with cooking if the dish take less than an hour to prepare.
  • And the dish tastes decent.
  • And there aren’t too many leftovers.
  • And I can handle the process four or so times a week, which meshes reasonably well with my writing group schedule.
  • And said dishes are sort of almost healthy.

So I read.  And I read some more.  All I had to do was to find a decent cookbook with simple recipes and not too many ingredients in each.  I’d be willing to put up with a failed recipe or two so long as the cooking time didn’t require a billion hours.  I scoured Amazon for “no item” and “microwave” cookbooks.

May I divert for a minute and ask the cooking pros out there why there aren’t more recipes focused on the most useful of all cooking devices?  The microwave has to be one of the best inventions ever in human history, up there with refrigeration, indoor plumbing and soap.  But every single cookbook out there focuses on the vastly more inefficient and annoying stove/oven.  I mean, to boil a kettle of water for a cup of tea takes five or six minutes while the microwave can warm up a nice cup in a minute, and if you stuff the teabag in before you nuke, the tea comes out just perfect after the beep.

Still, the nuker cookbooks were a bust, full of disgusting canned ingredients and just general uckiness.  The Amazon reviews said as much.  If cooking in the microwave was going to end up as preservative-laden and nasty as Applebee’s, why bother cooking at all?

And then I came across the Cooking Light series of books.  Maybe it was a Reddit post, or a random browsing of Amazon that led me to the original book: Cooking Light: 5 Ingredient 15 Minute Cookbook.  I mean, five ingredients?  Fifteen minutes?  I could do that!  I hurried to Barnes & Noble for more exhausting mental ingredient-synthesizing.  Except this book was full of nothing but heavy-duty meat dishes.  And lots of cilantro.  Oodles of cilantro.

My brain near exploded when I came across my near savior: Cooking Light: Fresh Food Fast. Unlike the first, this one had salads and sandwiches and noodles and variety! And most of the recipes included some kind of side dish for an actual meal.  Also, it suggested things like using pre-sliced veggies, and for those that weren’t, simple vertical cuts.  No julienne, no cubing.  In general, these recipes don’t require exotic equipment, so that was also a huge plus.

Devising A System

What’s any project without a pointless system to “streamline” and simplify the process?  In my case, I needed to find a way to somehow pre-plan, pre-anticipate indecision and get early buy-in from my husband on any week’s choices of food.  The system’s still in its early working stages, but it seems to “work” in a loose sense.

  1. Both parties scour recipes for things we can eat and mark relevant recipes as “edible.”  This was the hard part.  My husband and I don’t have many overlapping dislikes.  He hates olives.  I love them.  I despise cilantro.  He can’t taste it.  He likes eggs and cheese.  I don’t particularly like either.  Still, we ended up with about 100 mutually acceptable recipes, which has pretty much ended the “what do we eat?” debate.
  2. Each week, I pick two recipes and he picks two from the acceptable pool.  Since we’ve pre-consented to the recipes, neither of us is particularly unhappy with the other party’s choice.  This stops the whole “cook decides” potential series of arguments, since both parties have an equal voice in the meal choosing process.  And it cuts down on the number of decisions either of us has to make, since it’s only two each, instead of four.
  3. I make the grocery list and shop for the ingredients.  I have to say, this is the part I hate the most.  I’m terrible at following lists.  I suck at finding ingredients in any store.  And last week, I didn’t have the faintest clue what a raw shallot looked like.  Sure, I’ve eaten them cooked, but I’d pictured them as being more like a green onion than a half-garlic half-yellow onion mutation. Anyway, you might ask, “Why doesn’t your husband shop with you?”  This one’s simple: there’s a nice organic market near my Thursday night writing group’s meeting spot, so I just do the shopping before the meeting.  What really sucks most about the experience is having impatient yuppies glaring at you as you try to figure out the difference between a cutlet and a butterfly-cut chicken breast.
  4. Based on my mood, I pick one of the four things and cook it.  Yeah, there went the whole pretense of “democracy” in the process, right?  Well, whatever.  I’ve noticed my bias goes toward making my two choices first.  My husband picks the heartier, more complicated recipes.  I choose the salads and easy-peasy sandwiches.  I’m lazy.  You do the math.
  5. My husband cleans up the balance when the dishwasher gets too jammed for my lack of spatial ability.  Since that’s pretty much every day, and he can cram in three times as many dishes, this one’s a natural.

The hard stuff.

A couple of my friends are cooking gurus.  The biggest piece of advice I got was, “Get good knives.”  My husband claims the Faberware knife set I got in my single days is good.  I’m not actually sure.  It came in a handy-dandy tiny caddy that fit well in my old studio eleven years ago with some measuring spoons and cups.   The whole shebang was $20.00 at Ross or Marshalls or something.  I honestly don’t know if they’re “good” or not.  Still, they cut things.  And sometimes those things have been my fingers.  They seem to be sharp, and penetrate my finger-pads easily, so I’m guessing that means they’re good.  So that wasn’t the real hard part.

“Where’s the cutting board?” I asked my poor coughing husband on my first attempt.  We’re both still sick as dogs from the unholy flu-cold hybrid that’s floating around.

“Don’t we have one of those pull-out built-in things?”

No, our apartment is defective.

“Then it’s hiding in with the pans.”

Nope.  It was in with the unused rice cooker in the cupboard that’s almost permanently stuck shut by the melted felt sticker.

Set the grated cucumber aside in a separate dish.  Wait, I need more than one pan?  And I have to chop up meat-like ingredients, but I can’t use the same cutting board I’m using for the green onions, the mint and the peanuts.  What do I do?

Mix the bean sprouts with the mint and the peanuts.  I need bean sprouts?  Wait, I got everything on the list!  Except the bean sprouts.  Because I forgot to write them down in the three-page-long mutation that claimed to be a list.  Not that I would have been able to find them with all the yuppie-glaring as I blocked their entitled access to the cilantro as I tried to manipulate pen (for crossing off items), plastic bag, list, and grocery cart all in one hand.

Still, improvisation has always been one of my strengths, and I learned a few things quickly.

  1. A frying pan makes a good meat-handling and mixing board.  And it washes easily.  No cross-contamination fear!
  2. If you only have a couple of measuring cups worth of ingredients, you can store them easily in said cups.
  3. A hand-blender works well in lieu of an actual blender if you don’t mind spending six times as long “blending” and you’re stuck in the middle of a recipe.
  4. Never ever ever underestimate just how awesome a George Foreman grill can be, especially if you don’t have a real grill.
  5. You can actually make an unusual and tasty hummus from thawed frozen peas, two cloves of garlic, a bunch of mint, and a little water and olive oil.  Oooo!  And it was good with crackers too.
  6. Recipe quantities of an ingredient never actually match what comes in a can.  What the heck do I do with the other two ounces of pimentos?

Ongoing modifications.

Problem:  Writing the grocery list sucks and takes forever.  Low-tech solution: Use Notepad.  Contend with annoying Windows 8 printer networking laziness.  Misspell “cabbage” because you’re in a rush.  Time savings: 15 minutes.  Need to improve:  Actually categorizing ingredients with general store layout and location.  Annoying because this can take forever and I hate organizing things.

Problem:  Where is everything at the store?  Low-tech solution: Mentally catalog store layout and odd, illogical locations of ingredients.  Time savings: None.  You’re still bumbling around like an idiot until the third or fourth comprehensive visit.

Problem:  Not enough dishes and measuring things.  No chopping or blending devices.  Solution:  Buying more.  Further problem:  Research and expense and general additional shopping annoyance.  In progress.

Real lessons learned.

I’d originally intended this cooking thing as a quick experiment.  I wasn’t sure I could take cooking as often as I’d hoped, and I can’t say that I’ve actually cooked four days out of a week.  But I have cooked on four evenings before the ingredients I’d purchased went bad, and the process wasn’t that onerous beyond the actual hell of shopping.  We haven’t saved that much money over eating out, but the overall quality of the recipes and ingredients required in Cooking Light: Fresh Food Fast has been quite good.  Most of the expense has been toward building some kind of library of spices, so in the long run, costs will go down.

And I do mean the recipes are good.  Each of the four recipes I made has required relatively little oil, the ingredients are generally clean, and even though the quantities appear to be small compared to a typical restaurant portion, the meals are reasonably nutritionally balanced and filling.  And there’s none of that obnoxious no-carbiness, so woo-hoo!  Plus, for as few “ingredients” as the recipes claim to require, they actually taste like food!

I’ve also learned that “five ingredients, fifteen minutes” is a total exaggeration.  The average recipe requires about ten, and takes, with my utter lack of experience, about forty-five minutes to prepare.  There are leftovers, but not horrific weeks’ worth as in your typical recipe.  Instead, there’s a decent lunch left over the next day.  Eating something twice isn’t as awful as eating it for weeks at a time.  I’m guessing actual prep time will decrease as I get better at slicing things.

The best part, though?

Neither of us is dead from food poisoning!

Yet.

A Clash of Archetypes: Steven Pressfield’s “The War of Art,” A Review

She is not me, though I wish she was.

Temperance – She is not me, though I wish she was.

I’ve read all kinds of manifestos, from the short to the Communist.  I can either take them or leave them, honestly, which is probably why I haven’t come up with one of my own.  They can be motivating or distracting, boring or fascinating.  I can nod in agreement with every word or wish that the words could be scrubbed from the page before my eyes.  Which is why I’m not completely surprised that I didn’t find Steven Pressfield’s The War of Art to be the motivational masterpiece that so many others have.

I’ve been waging my own war with waning creativity lately, and perhaps that’s my problem.  For Pressfield, “resistance” is the enemy: the writer’s block, the tardy muse, the drugs and the sex and the rock ‘n’ roll that’s so much more appealing than forcing words to appear upon a page.  I can’t say he’s not right.  If there ever was an enemy to creativity, it would be that unnamed force that keeps the muse at bay.  All I know is that war is exhausting.

Raise that keyboard high!  Let the pencil strokes fly!

So, we fight!  We lift keyboard in hand and raise our pens to the fore!  We heft that palette upon our shield-arm, and thrust our brushes forward.  We slice and dice our ineffable enemy with keypresses and brushstrokes.  It won’t ever stop.  It’s around us everywhere, both seductive and violent.  It seeks to distract us from our objective: getting words on the page, lines and circles on the canvas.  It will stop at nothing to stop us.

You think you’re safe, don’t you?  You’re ensconced in your office or your studio, staring at the wide wall of your monitor, of your canvas.  You’ve barricaded the door, and blocked off all extraneous thought.  You have fingers poised, ready to perform intricate actions, to bring the vision that dances behind your eyes to life before you.  You ready yourself.  You’ve made sure your Maginot Line is well-fortified, and you’ve allied yourself with your neighboring distractions.

How about a little cake? something whispers in one ear.

You look around in alarm.  Nope, there’s nothing.  No one is holding a delicious slice of indulgence over your shoulder just inside your peripheral vision.  You return your attention to the blank whiteness before you.  You set your fingers on the home row.  You dip your brush into some basic black, then blue, and start stirring.

You’ll never be able to bring it to life, the voice says, menacing now.  You think you’re good enough, but you’re not!

But I am!  The voice is defiant, and you press deliberately upon the shift key.  The brush feels heavy in your hand as it hovers above the canvas.  And if I’m not, who will bring my creation to life?

That’s right!  Just hit that key!  I dare you!  And then another.  And then you’ll have a whole string of nonsense to cringe at!  Better to back away.

But!  But!  You slam your fingers over the keys now.  You’ve managed to write a sentence.  Your first line isn’t a thing of beauty, all smudged with paint or faulty antialiasing, but it’s there.  It’s a start.  You can always fix it later.

And I’ll be here later to bug you! the voice says.

You think you’ve won a respite, but Resistance has breached your Maginot Line.  Suddenly that imagined cake is looking pretty good, except it isn’t with you.  It’s at the bakery, halfway across town.  You put down another sentence, stroke out a gentle curve.  You mix another color, and futz with italics.  The cake screams, Buy me!  Its voice is louder than mere resistance.

Suddenly, you’re exhausted.  You’ve scratched out a start, but it isn’t anything close to what you intended, and your defenses are down.  You should keep slapping away at the enemy with your keyboard, jabbing at it with the cruel ballpoint of your trusty pen.  Instead, your head dips.

Curse you, Resistance!  You’ve won!

I’ve never been a warrior, unlike Pressfield.  I just don’t have the will to fight every day of my existence.  He might have armor and an unflagging spirit.  His words drip with challenge, and have been honed to optimal sharpness by a master blacksmith.  He slays, he declares victory every day.  I try to slay, thinking of the page’s blankness as an enemy, but instead I shrink away, pained.  I’m slashed to ribbons even as I’m seduced by distraction.

My inner storyteller is battered and bleeding, and she seeks respite from his relentless words.

And now she’s rambling about the Storyteller… sigh.

My inner writer isn’t a warrior.  My muse isn’t Durga.  Instead, she’s insatiably curious.  She’s innovative in her own quiet way.  She wants to know as much as you do what lies ahead for the myriad characters she’s woven, and wants to spin a yarn as best she can as they interact in the world she’s sculpted.  She is Storyteller, both for herself, and for anyone else who cares to listen to her words.  She hears Pressfield’s stirring words and lies down for a nap.

Nope, not for me, this endless clash!  It hurts too much!  Just tell me what comes next!

What next?  What is next?  She reaches inside herself for the world she’s created from the soil of thought and reality.  She feels it take shape in her hands as she feels the silken strand vibrate that she keeps connected to her characters at all times.  She sees as they do, and feels the clay flow into buildings, trees, races.  She watches and listens as they speak to each other.  She smiles as they become all the more alive in interaction.  In life.

Tell me, she whispers to them, what are you going to do?

Sometimes they comply with what she’s envisioned.  Sometimes they don’t, and chart their own course.  She is the last to predict, the first to step aside and let them assume control.  She speaks their words and thoughts.  She reveals their motivations and describes their actions.  She allows them to guide her fingers over the new world she’s created and refine it.  She is their conduit, their channel, and when they rest at the end of their journeys, she weeps until a new world beckons or new characters introduce themselves.

What’s next?

That should be my rallying cry, but sometimes I know what comes next and my Storyteller balks.  Why should I tell the story?  I already know what happens.  Who cares?

Because writing isn’t always about you, I tell her, but she usually ignores me.

I tell her to put on her armor and poke and prod herself into compliance with the corner of my keyboard, but she just curls up in a ball and hides.  I can’t blame her.

What does that have to do with archetypes?

I just recently started on Archetypes: Who Are You? by Caroline Myss.  So far, I’m not finding anything particularly surprising about it, though I haven’t really spent much time delving into my primary archetypes to see if there’s anything I can use to get me up off my butt creatively.

Myss points out in her introductory chapter that archetypes are universal.  Months before I picked up the book, I’d already intuited that Pressfield’s creativity is best represented by the Warrior archetype and that mine really isn’t.  I’m not a warrior, dammit!  I’m a Storyteller!  When I took Myss’ test at archetypeme.com, the results didn’t surprise me so much as finding out one of my dominant archetype’s alternate names is “Storyteller.”

In case you’re curious, my dominant results were: 33% Creative, 33% Intellectual and 14% Visionary.

I can see why so many creative and innovative artists find Pressfield’s work so motivating: my guess is that they either have a hint of the Warrior or the warrior’s drive within them.  Pioneers, heroes, and advocates all have to harness the warrior’s courage to impel others to change.  I’m a little too laid back (a very kind way of saying “low energy”) for his words to spur me properly.  Instead, I just felt tired after reading The War of Art.

The importance of ritual

If you take a look at the Amazon reviews for Pressfield’s book, you’ll see a number of comments about how Book 3 goes off the deep end in speaking of angels and rituals to the muses.  Sadly enough, this was the part of the book I found the most personally applicable, even if the language was highly figurative and “mystical” in nature.  Maybe Pressfield’s dead serious in viewing his language as concrete and literal, but I resonated with it on a more abstract level.

I’m going to diverge for a couple of seconds into the land of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator and cognitive functions.  You may or may not see the sixteen types of the MBTI as more pseudoscience and inaccurate mumbo-jumbo (I’m mixed about its true accuracy, even if I find my “type” describes me almost perfeclty).  Either way, to a certain extent, I’ve found the side-theory of cognitive functions to be very helpful in understanding how my personal thought process works.  Essentially, in this theory, there are four primary functions, expanded to eight based on their inward or outward direction: Thinking, Feeling, Sensing and Intuition.  All of these four can either be Extraverted (outwardly focused) or Introverted (inwardly focused).  I’m using Jung’s spelling of “extrovert.”

My personality type is INTP (Introverted Intuitive Thinking Perceiving), and my cognitive process stack is as follows:

  • Dominant: Introverted Thinking (personal inner mental model of the world outside)
  • Auxiliary: Extraverted Intuition (awareness of outer patterns and the complexity of the exterior universe and all its possibilities.  The “wheeeeee!” in life)
  • Tertiary: Introverted Sensing (recollection of personal experience in all its details, awareness of how the body feels internally)
  • Inferior: Extraverted Feeling (longing for universal harmony, universal values, the welfare of all within a group)

If you read a lot of books on developing intuition, you’ll find that most encompass the development of introverted intuition.  This is the land of gut feelings, your “sixth sense,” and the universe within you.  Pressfield’s was the first I’ve ever seen that explains exactly what extraverted intuition feels like.  You look and scan everything around you to get the gist of reality.  Suddenly, you’re smacked with an “A-ha!” moment, which can either hit you like a brick in the face, or like a gentle whisper.  When you hear of “angels” or muses actually whispering an idea in someone’s ear and you secretly wonder if the purveyor of such words is actually bonkers, maybe they aren’t.  Maybe they’re hearing their Extraverted Intuition talking and expressing the sensation in the most accurate way they can.  The experience feels highly abstracted, so the language follows suit.  Or maybe they really do believe they’re hearing angels and they’re nuts.

Pressfield’s rituals are precise, and his language, frankly, sounds insane if you’re not comfortable with extraverted intuition.  He’s elaborate in his processes for preparing his perception for the act of writing.  My own processes and rituals are far less precise, wacky and intense.  But, really, to ensure my best writing I do have a ritual to prep my mind for the writing act. In short, I prime my perception just as Pressfield does with his muse-invocations and prayers.

Basically, I imagine what mood I’m going to try to convey for the writing session.  I then visually scan my hard drive for the album that I think conveys the mood the most accurately.  I take a few deep breaths, fire up the album on Windows Media Player, and then I open my document.  Then I close my eyes and try to tap into my characters’ inner logic and emotions.  I remember what I wrote the previous session, and let myself get sucked into their world.  Without that kind of initial ritual and initiating process, my writing and inspiration suffer.

A germ of what might work for future exploration…

Who is your inner writer?  Who is your outer persona?  Are you a warrior?  A hero?  Someone who loves to slay inner demons?

If you’re like Pressfield at all, this manifesto will get your blood pumping.

I’m not.  Instead, I’m thinking I need to find a way to spark my Storyteller’s curiosity to get moving again.  I need to tap into her need to tell the story to others.  I need to actually perform my rituals to get her interested again.  In short, I need to focus on priming my perception.

Goal Setting Experiment Update #1: Success!

SAMSUNG

february results

Lookie! Xs mark the spots!

Ooo, accountability works– so far!

You can see the results here– five red X marks for five successive journaling days.  So, it would appear, at least initially, that being accountable seems to work… for a week.  We’ll see what happens next week.  I’m already not wanting to write today’s ten minutes of blather.

I have to say, journaling isn’t cracking up to be everything it’s reputed to be.  Maybe it’s just me, but I find that writing things down doesn’t exactly get them out of my mind.  In fact, I find myself ruminating over the things I write about all the more.  My journal jar is full of all kinds of prompts about past mistakes, past regrets, and past annoyances.  So, I write about them, hoping for a final cleansing purge, only to find myself reliving them over and over again in all their horrid detail.  One of these days, I’ll probably spend far too long talking about the perils of my exotic personality type, but for now, let’s just say that my long-term memory is far too vivid.

I’ve also had to do a switcheroo of journaling programs.  Daily Diary was far too annoying and anal for my taste.  It protested every time I flubbed up my “password” (literally) and wouldn’t work snapped with my Metro timer app.  So, I’m now using the far less irritating 7Days.  It’s still not helping me want to journal, but at least it’s not actively discouraging me.

Keeping it quiet works too!

You see the four blue X marks.  They’re right where they’re supposed to be, on Saturday, Monday, Tuesday and Thursday.   I like them.  They’re so pretty!  They’re a nice tangible reminder of the fact that this goal is on track to becoming a habit too.  Blue’s also my favorite color, which is another little incentive.

I’m kind of liking that I’m keeping this particular goal quiet.  I’ve failed too many times at setting this as a habit, so aside from experiment results, I’m glad I’m not feeling any external pressure to keep with it.  The lack of stress, honestly, is making it far easier to keep on track than with journaling, even if this habit is a lot more time consuming.

Conclusions?

None yet; I think it’s a little too early.  We’ll see what happens next week.